It is that time of year again when I like to sit down and
read a few scary books. Nothing is
better when the weather turns cold than curling up with book that spooks you
and makes the odd noises in your house more ominous. So I went through my through To Read Pile
selecting five or six books that hopefully fill the bill. First up is Dan Simmons’ A Winter
Haunting. This is a novel I have been
meaning to read for some time but have never got around to it. I did not realize that it was sequel to
earlier novel, Summer of Night. The
other reviews indicate it was helpful to read the other novel, but not
necessary.
A Winter Haunting is the tale of Professor Dale Stewart and
his descent into madness. Dale has had a
bad run of it for the last several years.
He cheated on his wife with a graduate student causing his wife and his
two girls to leave him. Then the
graduate student left him to pursue her studies at Princeton. He began to suffer from depression and unable
to sleep at night. He cannot even commit
suicide properly. Dale had the shotgun
in his mouth, pulled the trigger but the shell did not fire. It seems things are not going well at all for
Professor Stewart. But then again most
of these problems are of his making.
So Dale decides that he needs a change of scenery to get his
head straight and finish the novel he is working on. He decides to move to his boyhood town of Elm Haven, IL. This is a great idea as his novel is about
his summer of 1960 and the adventures that he and his shared. Unfortunately, Dale has a hard time
remembering certain horrific details about that summer, especially how his
friend Duane McBride was killed. It is my
understanding that this was the story Dan Simmons’ Summer of Night which was a
cross of The Body aka Stand by Me and It.
So, is it necessary to read the first novel to follow the events in this
book? My answer would be yes as there
are events in the novel that made no sense and was hopefully covered in Summer
of Night.
The question is, was this book filled with tension and did creep
me out? For the most part the answer is
no. The first three-quarters of the
story plods along with portions of the story alternating between his exploits
in Elm Haven and the details of his extra-martial affair. This would be fine if the character was in
any way interesting. Stephen King is the
masters of building up his characters to a point were you care about them and
making you squirm for the rest of the novel while he messes with them. In this respect Dan Simmons falls short.
There are some real creepy events in the last 100 pages that
really started to make the novel interesting.
Some of them are bit contrived but work in the context of the
novel. At the conclusion Mr. Simmons
takes a left turn back into reality and in my opinion spoils the ending. I would have liked for him to push his story
to the next level instead of taking the safe route.
No comments:
Post a Comment